<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Daily Buddhism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailybuddhism.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailybuddhism.com</link>
	<description>A Daily Dose of Buddhist Wisdom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 10:20:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on If You Meet The Buddha On The Road, Kill Him by Patchz</title>
		<link>http://www.dailybuddhism.com/archives/670/comment-page-2#comment-3147</link>
		<dc:creator>Patchz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 10:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailybuddhism.com/?p=670#comment-3147</guid>
		<description>The search for Buddha is the search for enlightenment.  That is to say we seek the meaning of life, the meaning of existence, or simply the meaning. When they say that you are the Buddha, it is basically saying that God is within us and that we are each a part of God, and God is a part of us.  All life is connected even if we can not see the connection, feel it or taste it.  When you see a hungry beggar on the street, stop and feed them. If need be wash them clothe them, and practice the basic golden rule of treating others as we would want to be treated. Christ said the same as well when he said how you treat the lowliest of men is how you treat me, because all men are my brothers and women my sisters, my parents, my children. Christ was truly an enlightened man. He saw the truth in life, that everything has a connection to each other and is on some level dependent upon every other person.  He did not spend his days amongst only the rich and famous although clearly He could have. Instead he was known for and often condemned for spending his time amongst the sick, the poor, the unwashed, and the dregs of humanity. When asked by people what they could do for him, he replied that what ever you do for the least of humanity, you do for me. This is the same message that is spread through most religions. The idea is that people matter. It is up to each of us to assist our fellow man, to help one another, to sacrifice for each other and to share our happiness. There is also involved in most religions the concept that yesterday is gone, tomorrow is always in the future, and that all we have is today, this moment in time, and it is up to us how we spend that precious moment. We can wallow in our own unhappiness, we can cause others to be unhappy, or we can choose to find joy, and to share that joy with others, without boundaries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The search for Buddha is the search for enlightenment.  That is to say we seek the meaning of life, the meaning of existence, or simply the meaning. When they say that you are the Buddha, it is basically saying that God is within us and that we are each a part of God, and God is a part of us.  All life is connected even if we can not see the connection, feel it or taste it.  When you see a hungry beggar on the street, stop and feed them. If need be wash them clothe them, and practice the basic golden rule of treating others as we would want to be treated. Christ said the same as well when he said how you treat the lowliest of men is how you treat me, because all men are my brothers and women my sisters, my parents, my children. Christ was truly an enlightened man. He saw the truth in life, that everything has a connection to each other and is on some level dependent upon every other person.  He did not spend his days amongst only the rich and famous although clearly He could have. Instead he was known for and often condemned for spending his time amongst the sick, the poor, the unwashed, and the dregs of humanity. When asked by people what they could do for him, he replied that what ever you do for the least of humanity, you do for me. This is the same message that is spread through most religions. The idea is that people matter. It is up to each of us to assist our fellow man, to help one another, to sacrifice for each other and to share our happiness. There is also involved in most religions the concept that yesterday is gone, tomorrow is always in the future, and that all we have is today, this moment in time, and it is up to us how we spend that precious moment. We can wallow in our own unhappiness, we can cause others to be unhappy, or we can choose to find joy, and to share that joy with others, without boundaries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Koan: The Strawberry by John</title>
		<link>http://www.dailybuddhism.com/archives/903/comment-page-1#comment-3146</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 07:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailybuddhism.com/?p=903#comment-3146</guid>
		<description>The both tigers to me represent suffering which the man was attempting to avoid by grasping the vine. The man clearly thought he was avoiding the tiger by swinging himself over the cliff. The vine may represent the mans life which he grasped with one hand while reaching out for the strawberry which to me represents pleasure because it was sweet. It is our desire for pleasure or our attachment that leads to death or suffering which are two sides of the same coin. The mice must represent something subtle because the man did not notice them. Although the man enjoyed the sweetness of the strawberry it was temporary. He inevitably met finally with a tiger again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The both tigers to me represent suffering which the man was attempting to avoid by grasping the vine. The man clearly thought he was avoiding the tiger by swinging himself over the cliff. The vine may represent the mans life which he grasped with one hand while reaching out for the strawberry which to me represents pleasure because it was sweet. It is our desire for pleasure or our attachment that leads to death or suffering which are two sides of the same coin. The mice must represent something subtle because the man did not notice them. Although the man enjoyed the sweetness of the strawberry it was temporary. He inevitably met finally with a tiger again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Podcast Episode 60: Buddhism Once Again by Charles-G</title>
		<link>http://www.dailybuddhism.com/archives/1418/comment-page-1#comment-3143</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles-G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 15:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailybuddhism.com/?p=1418#comment-3143</guid>
		<description>Brian we miss you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian we miss you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on If You Meet The Buddha On The Road, Kill Him by sturgeone</title>
		<link>http://www.dailybuddhism.com/archives/670/comment-page-2#comment-3142</link>
		<dc:creator>sturgeone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 21:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailybuddhism.com/?p=670#comment-3142</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t come here, and I ain&#039;t leaving.
--Willie Nelson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t come here, and I ain&#8217;t leaving.<br />
&#8211;Willie Nelson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 12 Steps, Higher Powers, and Buddhism by Matt Basil</title>
		<link>http://www.dailybuddhism.com/archives/1416/comment-page-1#comment-3141</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Basil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 10:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailybuddhism.com/?p=1416#comment-3141</guid>
		<description>In my opinion, a higher power is that of which is either spiritual blood to god or is one of those who have been assigned a position dealing with the balance of all dimensions, life, or death. The Buddah may very well be one of many Higher Power.
&lt;a HREF=&quot;http://bestdietpills4weightloss.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;7 chakras Meditation&lt;/A&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion, a higher power is that of which is either spiritual blood to god or is one of those who have been assigned a position dealing with the balance of all dimensions, life, or death. The Buddah may very well be one of many Higher Power.<br />
<a HREF="http://bestdietpills4weightloss.com/" rel="nofollow">7 chakras Meditation</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Koan: No Loving Kindness by the-ramen-girl</title>
		<link>http://www.dailybuddhism.com/archives/123/comment-page-1#comment-3137</link>
		<dc:creator>the-ramen-girl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 18:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailybuddhism.com/archives/123#comment-3137</guid>
		<description>my reply to a 2 yr old post:

i think that line of the monk simply meant he made a lot of &#039;progress&#039; regardless of the conditions or circumstances he was in.

&#039;An old tree grows on a cold rock in winter,&#039; &#039;Nowhere is there any warmth.&#039;

my translation of this would be &#039;i (old tree) made progress in a (cold) hut even w/o any (physical) warmth from anyone&#039;

so sexual act is not necessary to continue his journey.

the hut was burned down because the old lady sheltered and fed him for over 20 yrs, and to her perhaps what she did already meant loving kindness and that the monk should&#039;ve at least showed some care to the girl.  clearly, the old woman didn&#039;t understand the poetic response of the monk. it is the monk who journeyed through the path of enlightenment and not the old woman so what authority does she have to judge his progress? so since her relative mind fogs her understanding, she thought the monk didn&#039;t learn anything and it&#039;s useless to continue to shelter him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my reply to a 2 yr old post:</p>
<p>i think that line of the monk simply meant he made a lot of &#8216;progress&#8217; regardless of the conditions or circumstances he was in.</p>
<p>&#8216;An old tree grows on a cold rock in winter,&#8217; &#8216;Nowhere is there any warmth.&#8217;</p>
<p>my translation of this would be &#8216;i (old tree) made progress in a (cold) hut even w/o any (physical) warmth from anyone&#8217;</p>
<p>so sexual act is not necessary to continue his journey.</p>
<p>the hut was burned down because the old lady sheltered and fed him for over 20 yrs, and to her perhaps what she did already meant loving kindness and that the monk should&#8217;ve at least showed some care to the girl.  clearly, the old woman didn&#8217;t understand the poetic response of the monk. it is the monk who journeyed through the path of enlightenment and not the old woman so what authority does she have to judge his progress? so since her relative mind fogs her understanding, she thought the monk didn&#8217;t learn anything and it&#8217;s useless to continue to shelter him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on If You Meet The Buddha On The Road, Kill Him by mano</title>
		<link>http://www.dailybuddhism.com/archives/670/comment-page-2#comment-3136</link>
		<dc:creator>mano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 06:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailybuddhism.com/?p=670#comment-3136</guid>
		<description>when you are the buddha you dont meet him at the road.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when you are the buddha you dont meet him at the road.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on If You Meet The Buddha On The Road, Kill Him by Sandra Starflower</title>
		<link>http://www.dailybuddhism.com/archives/670/comment-page-2#comment-3135</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandra Starflower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 16:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailybuddhism.com/?p=670#comment-3135</guid>
		<description>&quot;He who thinks he knows, does not know.&quot;  Have the presence of mind to explore and see things just as they are, without labels or judgements.  Things are constantly changing, yet there is a continuity to the flow.  Be curious, keep on practicing......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;He who thinks he knows, does not know.&#8221;  Have the presence of mind to explore and see things just as they are, without labels or judgements.  Things are constantly changing, yet there is a continuity to the flow.  Be curious, keep on practicing&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Sensitive Topic by Bobby</title>
		<link>http://www.dailybuddhism.com/archives/1081/comment-page-1#comment-3134</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 15:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailybuddhism.com/?p=1081#comment-3134</guid>
		<description>I think it is great that such a topic has been raised and there are some great answers. My take on the masterbation question is this. Masterbation is not naughty which then creates negative karma, the reason why we are advised not to is because every single one of us contains a vast amount of energy within us. When a man for instance ejaculates, he has the potential to impregnate every woman in the USA, that&#039;s a lot of energy. By not masterbating you are keeping that energy within you to direct into other areas of your life that are more beneficial, eg meditation, healing, helping others and even long life. If there is no benefit in no masterbation then why do monks and nuns take the vow of no masterbation, is it for no reason what so ever?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is great that such a topic has been raised and there are some great answers. My take on the masterbation question is this. Masterbation is not naughty which then creates negative karma, the reason why we are advised not to is because every single one of us contains a vast amount of energy within us. When a man for instance ejaculates, he has the potential to impregnate every woman in the USA, that&#8217;s a lot of energy. By not masterbating you are keeping that energy within you to direct into other areas of your life that are more beneficial, eg meditation, healing, helping others and even long life. If there is no benefit in no masterbation then why do monks and nuns take the vow of no masterbation, is it for no reason what so ever?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Koan: The Stingy Artist by Kevin M.</title>
		<link>http://www.dailybuddhism.com/archives/1406/comment-page-1#comment-3132</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 21:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailybuddhism.com/?p=1406#comment-3132</guid>
		<description>Gessen wanted to maintain the simplicity of his own activity, uncomplicated by social relationships, and in so doing maintain a kind of purity of action.  He was not actually goal-seeking, but centered in his meditative practice.  He did not want to become attached to his wishes, and this why he separated his actions from his goals.  We should be careful to understand that painting enabled Gessen to achieve his three wishes, but he did not paint so that he could achieve these wishes.  This is the central lesson in this story.

While this is a relatively common theme in Buddhist teaching stories, we should be careful about taking this kind of story as a literal example, as in &quot;what would Gessen have done?&quot;  Open and honest communication within the Sangha is nurturing of spiritual growth.  While remaining centered in our practice, we should be careful of assuming that our spiritual practice justifies sowing confusion.

Is this considered to be a koan?  I probably would have called it a teaching story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gessen wanted to maintain the simplicity of his own activity, uncomplicated by social relationships, and in so doing maintain a kind of purity of action.  He was not actually goal-seeking, but centered in his meditative practice.  He did not want to become attached to his wishes, and this why he separated his actions from his goals.  We should be careful to understand that painting enabled Gessen to achieve his three wishes, but he did not paint so that he could achieve these wishes.  This is the central lesson in this story.</p>
<p>While this is a relatively common theme in Buddhist teaching stories, we should be careful about taking this kind of story as a literal example, as in &#8220;what would Gessen have done?&#8221;  Open and honest communication within the Sangha is nurturing of spiritual growth.  While remaining centered in our practice, we should be careful of assuming that our spiritual practice justifies sowing confusion.</p>
<p>Is this considered to be a koan?  I probably would have called it a teaching story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why all the Chanting? by Billie</title>
		<link>http://www.dailybuddhism.com/archives/932/comment-page-1#comment-3124</link>
		<dc:creator>Billie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 21:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailybuddhism.com/?p=932#comment-3124</guid>
		<description>I feel I&#039;m finally ready to make Buddhism my final religion, I&#039;ve studied many religions (Scientology,Catholicism,Methodist,Pentecostal,Christianity,Nazarene,Baptist,Mormon)  and in theory &quot;practice&quot; Buddhism makes perfect since to me. I have seen an experienced a few miracles in my lifetime and I know an afterlife and a Supreme Being does exist without any doubt. 

Buddhism is still very new to me and I&#039;m so excited to learn more. Buddhism is apart of my eternal soul and everything I&#039;ve ever stood for in my entire life of 44 years. 

Thanking you deeply for this website

Billie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel I&#8217;m finally ready to make Buddhism my final religion, I&#8217;ve studied many religions (Scientology,Catholicism,Methodist,Pentecostal,Christianity,Nazarene,Baptist,Mormon)  and in theory &#8220;practice&#8221; Buddhism makes perfect since to me. I have seen an experienced a few miracles in my lifetime and I know an afterlife and a Supreme Being does exist without any doubt. </p>
<p>Buddhism is still very new to me and I&#8217;m so excited to learn more. Buddhism is apart of my eternal soul and everything I&#8217;ve ever stood for in my entire life of 44 years. </p>
<p>Thanking you deeply for this website</p>
<p>Billie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on If You Meet The Buddha On The Road, Kill Him by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.dailybuddhism.com/archives/670/comment-page-2#comment-3123</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 19:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailybuddhism.com/?p=670#comment-3123</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a wonderful thing to know you feel confused. Confusion leads to reaching for better understanding. Confusion leads to curiosity. Confusion leads to exploration. Confusion leads to searching for new and better ways, openness, and growth. And as M. Scott Peck noticed, &quot;Virtually all the evil in this world is committed by those who are absolutely certain they know what they are doing.&quot;  So when you meet someone who has a bit of &quot;monkey-mind,&quot; going on, consider what it is you mean when you say you believe in love and non-judgmentalism. Consider whether or not you truly believe in compassion, encouragement, and enlightenment. Consider whether or not you are really certain you comprehend all that much about what matters in life. Consider whether or not you&#039;re really certain about anything, because it could be that seemingly confused person with the monkey-mind is the Buddha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a wonderful thing to know you feel confused. Confusion leads to reaching for better understanding. Confusion leads to curiosity. Confusion leads to exploration. Confusion leads to searching for new and better ways, openness, and growth. And as M. Scott Peck noticed, &#8220;Virtually all the evil in this world is committed by those who are absolutely certain they know what they are doing.&#8221;  So when you meet someone who has a bit of &#8220;monkey-mind,&#8221; going on, consider what it is you mean when you say you believe in love and non-judgmentalism. Consider whether or not you truly believe in compassion, encouragement, and enlightenment. Consider whether or not you are really certain you comprehend all that much about what matters in life. Consider whether or not you&#8217;re really certain about anything, because it could be that seemingly confused person with the monkey-mind is the Buddha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Help With Mindfulness and Meditation by Max</title>
		<link>http://www.dailybuddhism.com/archives/1410/comment-page-1#comment-3120</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 02:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailybuddhism.com/?p=1410#comment-3120</guid>
		<description>To help bring me back to a state of mindfulness, I carry around a small rock which I keep in my pocket or place on the desk/table I&#039;m at.  It worked very well for a while until I got used to it being everywhere with me, then it was less effective.  I lost it recently so I&#039;m casually looking for a new one.

I also try to be mindful of the body and breath whenever I am walking, and I try to remind myself to be mindful when sitting or doing something else.  If you check the time often, perhaps set checking the time to be a mindfulness bell.  You have to find what works for you, and it takes a persistent effort to keep the object/experience as a cue.

To help meditate daily, I made a commitment to meditate every day for at least 5 minutes.  I almost always stick to this, since 5 minutes is so little time and I can do it before bed if I haven&#039;t yet.  Once I get in the habit of meditating every day, I look forward to meditating because I see the rewards I get from it.  Being mindful of the rewards of meditation will help keep up the motivation to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To help bring me back to a state of mindfulness, I carry around a small rock which I keep in my pocket or place on the desk/table I&#8217;m at.  It worked very well for a while until I got used to it being everywhere with me, then it was less effective.  I lost it recently so I&#8217;m casually looking for a new one.</p>
<p>I also try to be mindful of the body and breath whenever I am walking, and I try to remind myself to be mindful when sitting or doing something else.  If you check the time often, perhaps set checking the time to be a mindfulness bell.  You have to find what works for you, and it takes a persistent effort to keep the object/experience as a cue.</p>
<p>To help meditate daily, I made a commitment to meditate every day for at least 5 minutes.  I almost always stick to this, since 5 minutes is so little time and I can do it before bed if I haven&#8217;t yet.  Once I get in the habit of meditating every day, I look forward to meditating because I see the rewards I get from it.  Being mindful of the rewards of meditation will help keep up the motivation to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Creation And Evolution in Buddhism by ethana2</title>
		<link>http://www.dailybuddhism.com/archives/96/comment-page-1#comment-3119</link>
		<dc:creator>ethana2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailybuddhism.com/archives/96#comment-3119</guid>
		<description>I think there&#039;s definitely a degree of folly to questions like the origin of existence, but only for sure up until we&#039;ve figured out what all is in existence. In other words, I think that if and when all theoretical predictions are experimentally verified and all experimental observations are theoretically accounted for, we will for the first time have a foundation from which asking the question of existence itself will begin to be legitimate-- which is part of why i&#039;m so thrilled about cosmology and physics. If Buddhism is committed to accepting science wherever it speaks, then I would definitely call it too rational for the term &quot;religion&quot;.

I personally think that matter cannot be created or destroyed at a different time than its native frame of reference, and that existence is relative; it&#039;s meaningless to say that something exists unless it is in our multiverse, because it doesn&#039;t exist relative to us, and we don&#039;t exist relative to it..  So ultimately, creation can happen any moment, without violating my understanding of the universe, as long as its results are undetectable from an external vantage point and ultimately meaningless. What I&#039;m most interested in is not the existence of matter so much as the laws that of physics that underpin it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there&#8217;s definitely a degree of folly to questions like the origin of existence, but only for sure up until we&#8217;ve figured out what all is in existence. In other words, I think that if and when all theoretical predictions are experimentally verified and all experimental observations are theoretically accounted for, we will for the first time have a foundation from which asking the question of existence itself will begin to be legitimate&#8211; which is part of why i&#8217;m so thrilled about cosmology and physics. If Buddhism is committed to accepting science wherever it speaks, then I would definitely call it too rational for the term &#8220;religion&#8221;.</p>
<p>I personally think that matter cannot be created or destroyed at a different time than its native frame of reference, and that existence is relative; it&#8217;s meaningless to say that something exists unless it is in our multiverse, because it doesn&#8217;t exist relative to us, and we don&#8217;t exist relative to it..  So ultimately, creation can happen any moment, without violating my understanding of the universe, as long as its results are undetectable from an external vantage point and ultimately meaningless. What I&#8217;m most interested in is not the existence of matter so much as the laws that of physics that underpin it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on If You Meet The Buddha On The Road, Kill Him by Somwang</title>
		<link>http://www.dailybuddhism.com/archives/670/comment-page-2#comment-3110</link>
		<dc:creator>Somwang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 20:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailybuddhism.com/?p=670#comment-3110</guid>
		<description>1) Animal are all reborn infinite time into many forms, so of course, in uncountable condition and location.

Animal = mind + form

Tree has no mind and form with auto reaction but no intention.

Animal have intention.

Form can be both tangible and intangible.

2) Birth and Death is together. Cannot be separate.

3) Death is suffering.

Asks yrself, do U still wan to reborn if U can remember all the past infinite life.

The only way to be no reborn is to return the mind to the nature.

The process to return the mind cannot be the intention way but it&#039;s an automatic way when U see the ultimate truth enough with yr own eyes.

Ultimately truth is 

1) Everything is impermanent. (Look at yr own body, U need to keep moving even at sleep.)

2) Everything is suffering (Impermanent --&gt; Suffering)

3) Everything has no real owner or has no self. (It&#039;s all temporary condition, U can not own it)

The illusion come from memory and thinking. Keep looking at yr self whether moving of body or mind.

The mind as as subject is to know the object. Mind and object is different thing

To be continue....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) Animal are all reborn infinite time into many forms, so of course, in uncountable condition and location.</p>
<p>Animal = mind + form</p>
<p>Tree has no mind and form with auto reaction but no intention.</p>
<p>Animal have intention.</p>
<p>Form can be both tangible and intangible.</p>
<p>2) Birth and Death is together. Cannot be separate.</p>
<p>3) Death is suffering.</p>
<p>Asks yrself, do U still wan to reborn if U can remember all the past infinite life.</p>
<p>The only way to be no reborn is to return the mind to the nature.</p>
<p>The process to return the mind cannot be the intention way but it&#8217;s an automatic way when U see the ultimate truth enough with yr own eyes.</p>
<p>Ultimately truth is </p>
<p>1) Everything is impermanent. (Look at yr own body, U need to keep moving even at sleep.)</p>
<p>2) Everything is suffering (Impermanent &#8211;> Suffering)</p>
<p>3) Everything has no real owner or has no self. (It&#8217;s all temporary condition, U can not own it)</p>
<p>The illusion come from memory and thinking. Keep looking at yr self whether moving of body or mind.</p>
<p>The mind as as subject is to know the object. Mind and object is different thing</p>
<p>To be continue&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Buddhist Parenting and Discipline by David Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.dailybuddhism.com/archives/1096/comment-page-1#comment-3107</link>
		<dc:creator>David Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 11:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailybuddhism.com/?p=1096#comment-3107</guid>
		<description>Discipline has been a non-issue once applying the buddhist path in our household.  This is consistent with &quot;Jo&quot; above.  Why would a child need to be disciplined?  Seeing the child as the cause of an issue is ignorance, and demonstrates a lack of the understanding of emptiness.

When children misbehave, one helpful strategy is instead of blaming of the children, blame Mara, the demon of ignorance.  When we are under stress we know from psychology we exaggerate, and this is the root of ignorance.  When children misbehave we are most stressed and are going to have a hard time being high and noble and do the right thing.  Physiologically the brain exaggerates especially under times of stress, and ignorance is deepest.  The mind wants someone or something to blame.  Allowing this thing to be Mara is very helpful.  It gives the mind something real and tangible.

The benefits of seeing Mara attacking our children is that it allows us to displace our frustration towards Mara, and fundamental ignorance, which also increases our desire to follow the path.  Further, blaming Mara engenders compassion for our children who are being attacked.  The children are the victims of misbehavior.  They misbehave because they themselves have the causes and conditions of suffering.  Using the word &quot;attacked&quot; is important because we would react quickly and strongly to our children being attacked and we would see ourselves on their side, rather than on the opposing side.  We stand united in our fight against ignorance!

For example, when my children fight, I quickly think they are being attacked, and I realize that they are doing so because they are both ignorant.  I feel bad for them.  I see that they fight because they suffer.  They suffer because they are attacked.  They suffer because they exaggerate.  I have great compassion for them.  I get angry at Mara instead.  I feel like it&#039;s us against Mara.  I show them both kindness, and kindly physically separate them.  I see them almost as infected with the disease of ignorance.  I love them both.

What other discipline issues are there?  There are natural consequences, from certain actions such as not wearing a coat outside.  The consequence? They get cold.

There are some situations in which the children are doing something dangerous, but these situations should be rare, and if they are not, then you probably have issues with where they are living or where you are taking them.  If you have things in your house that you are attached to, then attached to that get damaged, then again this is your issue of attachment.

Discipline just reinforces fundamental ignorance by encouraging the development of a self that has power.  The children, nor do we, have power. This is the root of ignorance: the belief in inherent selves and their power.

The other issue that is helpful in children is that children are like emotions that are outside of our body. They react in ways that we cannot control and they can be an amazing teacher.  We often want to hide, suppress, or control our emotions.  Children remind us this is not possible.  Like emotions, they are beyond our control.  They are perfect opportunities to practice the Middle Way.  This is practicing the dharma.  Often people look to meditation as the only way to develop themselves, but practice itself is very valuable.  When you have children you have the opportunity to practice selflessness (not to be confused with self sacrifice).  

For what it&#039;s worth my children have been professionally evaluated and are constantly evaluated at their school.  They both rank exceptionally high on the scales of empathy, security, and assertiveness.  In other words, this is not theory, it works. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Discipline has been a non-issue once applying the buddhist path in our household.  This is consistent with &#8220;Jo&#8221; above.  Why would a child need to be disciplined?  Seeing the child as the cause of an issue is ignorance, and demonstrates a lack of the understanding of emptiness.</p>
<p>When children misbehave, one helpful strategy is instead of blaming of the children, blame Mara, the demon of ignorance.  When we are under stress we know from psychology we exaggerate, and this is the root of ignorance.  When children misbehave we are most stressed and are going to have a hard time being high and noble and do the right thing.  Physiologically the brain exaggerates especially under times of stress, and ignorance is deepest.  The mind wants someone or something to blame.  Allowing this thing to be Mara is very helpful.  It gives the mind something real and tangible.</p>
<p>The benefits of seeing Mara attacking our children is that it allows us to displace our frustration towards Mara, and fundamental ignorance, which also increases our desire to follow the path.  Further, blaming Mara engenders compassion for our children who are being attacked.  The children are the victims of misbehavior.  They misbehave because they themselves have the causes and conditions of suffering.  Using the word &#8220;attacked&#8221; is important because we would react quickly and strongly to our children being attacked and we would see ourselves on their side, rather than on the opposing side.  We stand united in our fight against ignorance!</p>
<p>For example, when my children fight, I quickly think they are being attacked, and I realize that they are doing so because they are both ignorant.  I feel bad for them.  I see that they fight because they suffer.  They suffer because they are attacked.  They suffer because they exaggerate.  I have great compassion for them.  I get angry at Mara instead.  I feel like it&#8217;s us against Mara.  I show them both kindness, and kindly physically separate them.  I see them almost as infected with the disease of ignorance.  I love them both.</p>
<p>What other discipline issues are there?  There are natural consequences, from certain actions such as not wearing a coat outside.  The consequence? They get cold.</p>
<p>There are some situations in which the children are doing something dangerous, but these situations should be rare, and if they are not, then you probably have issues with where they are living or where you are taking them.  If you have things in your house that you are attached to, then attached to that get damaged, then again this is your issue of attachment.</p>
<p>Discipline just reinforces fundamental ignorance by encouraging the development of a self that has power.  The children, nor do we, have power. This is the root of ignorance: the belief in inherent selves and their power.</p>
<p>The other issue that is helpful in children is that children are like emotions that are outside of our body. They react in ways that we cannot control and they can be an amazing teacher.  We often want to hide, suppress, or control our emotions.  Children remind us this is not possible.  Like emotions, they are beyond our control.  They are perfect opportunities to practice the Middle Way.  This is practicing the dharma.  Often people look to meditation as the only way to develop themselves, but practice itself is very valuable.  When you have children you have the opportunity to practice selflessness (not to be confused with self sacrifice).  </p>
<p>For what it&#8217;s worth my children have been professionally evaluated and are constantly evaluated at their school.  They both rank exceptionally high on the scales of empathy, security, and assertiveness.  In other words, this is not theory, it works. <img src='http://www.dailybuddhism.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Buddhist Diet by Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.dailybuddhism.com/archives/1184/comment-page-1#comment-3106</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 03:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailybuddhism.com/?p=1184#comment-3106</guid>
		<description>Just a thought, playing devils advocate..  Since our minds are like sponges(like children or if one is fully enlightened) Isn&#039;t everything a mind altering substance. Even looking at a murderous crime scene will alter your mind to fit the situation. Your emotion and reasoning will follow what is being unfolded in front of ones attention. Even if we are mindful and aware of our awareness we are still being altered, maybe a better word to describe an altered state is progression. If one could be happy, respectful, and compassionate totally high by smoking marijuana, what makes that different from any other experience, its all progression, it always happens in linear format. Achieving so much fulfillment in anyway, isn&#039;t that what life is about? Living it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a thought, playing devils advocate..  Since our minds are like sponges(like children or if one is fully enlightened) Isn&#8217;t everything a mind altering substance. Even looking at a murderous crime scene will alter your mind to fit the situation. Your emotion and reasoning will follow what is being unfolded in front of ones attention. Even if we are mindful and aware of our awareness we are still being altered, maybe a better word to describe an altered state is progression. If one could be happy, respectful, and compassionate totally high by smoking marijuana, what makes that different from any other experience, its all progression, it always happens in linear format. Achieving so much fulfillment in anyway, isn&#8217;t that what life is about? Living it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Creation And Evolution in Buddhism by pradeep daryao borkar</title>
		<link>http://www.dailybuddhism.com/archives/96/comment-page-1#comment-3103</link>
		<dc:creator>pradeep daryao borkar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2011 16:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailybuddhism.com/archives/96#comment-3103</guid>
		<description>samyak way to approach buddhism through science</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>samyak way to approach buddhism through science</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on If You Meet The Buddha On The Road, Kill Him by Raymond</title>
		<link>http://www.dailybuddhism.com/archives/670/comment-page-2#comment-3079</link>
		<dc:creator>Raymond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 21:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailybuddhism.com/?p=670#comment-3079</guid>
		<description>If you meet someone who claims to have all the answers (regardless of subject)get away from them and continue learning on your on or from various teachers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you meet someone who claims to have all the answers (regardless of subject)get away from them and continue learning on your on or from various teachers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on If You Meet The Buddha On The Road, Kill Him by Dusty Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.dailybuddhism.com/archives/670/comment-page-2#comment-3072</link>
		<dc:creator>Dusty Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2011 21:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailybuddhism.com/?p=670#comment-3072</guid>
		<description>OMG! Why are you doing this to me? I can only understand HALF of what you people are trying to say and it gets me confused. E.g.: &quot;...you can&#039;t get something from nothing--but you can get everythign from something&quot;? WTF?! Why are you all talking in riddles? &quot;Before enlightenment, chop wood, carry water. After enlightenment, chop wood, carry water.&quot; They&#039;re both the same, nothing happened. How can I get something from nothing? &quot;Enlightenment is not seeing the truth but seeing it isn&#039;t there.&quot; Seeing what that isn&#039;t there? Where? Where are you looking? Obviously, you aren&#039;t looking physically at something. But what truth are you trying to find? Obviously, THE truth, but how can you find it if you don&#039;t know what it looks like when you finally find it? And how can you be sure you have found it if it isn&#039;t there, when you finally find it???
The one about being humble but then thinking you are, suddenly makes you NOT humble is just plain confusing. It&#039;s all confusing but the words are trying to say something that makes sense but it&#039;s not all making sense when you try to unravel it all---it&#039;s damn frustrating really. It&#039;s like being so close but then realizing how close you really are and then suddenly you realize that you aren&#039;t close at all but so very far away---if that all makese sense (sorry).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG! Why are you doing this to me? I can only understand HALF of what you people are trying to say and it gets me confused. E.g.: &#8220;&#8230;you can&#8217;t get something from nothing&#8211;but you can get everythign from something&#8221;? WTF?! Why are you all talking in riddles? &#8220;Before enlightenment, chop wood, carry water. After enlightenment, chop wood, carry water.&#8221; They&#8217;re both the same, nothing happened. How can I get something from nothing? &#8220;Enlightenment is not seeing the truth but seeing it isn&#8217;t there.&#8221; Seeing what that isn&#8217;t there? Where? Where are you looking? Obviously, you aren&#8217;t looking physically at something. But what truth are you trying to find? Obviously, THE truth, but how can you find it if you don&#8217;t know what it looks like when you finally find it? And how can you be sure you have found it if it isn&#8217;t there, when you finally find it???<br />
The one about being humble but then thinking you are, suddenly makes you NOT humble is just plain confusing. It&#8217;s all confusing but the words are trying to say something that makes sense but it&#8217;s not all making sense when you try to unravel it all&#8212;it&#8217;s damn frustrating really. It&#8217;s like being so close but then realizing how close you really are and then suddenly you realize that you aren&#8217;t close at all but so very far away&#8212;if that all makese sense (sorry).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on If You Meet The Buddha On The Road, Kill Him by DONNA-MADONNA GANN</title>
		<link>http://www.dailybuddhism.com/archives/670/comment-page-2#comment-3071</link>
		<dc:creator>DONNA-MADONNA GANN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 18:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailybuddhism.com/?p=670#comment-3071</guid>
		<description>IF YOU DONT UNDERSTAND IT, GET RID OF IT!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IF YOU DONT UNDERSTAND IT, GET RID OF IT!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Buddhism and Homosexuality by Christopher Wick</title>
		<link>http://www.dailybuddhism.com/archives/697/comment-page-1#comment-3032</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Wick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 05:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailybuddhism.com/?p=697#comment-3032</guid>
		<description>I feel this instruction to be very rewarding in regard to sexual behavior. I would take it that if you are attracted to someone of the same sex, feel love and joy for their presence and your own in union with one another, that your intent is to seek enlightenment in this joy, and agreement with the other, it would follow that to be sexual with someone of the opposite sex who do not feel these things for would be sexual misconduct. Thank you, I am humbled and grounded in light of reason and compassion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel this instruction to be very rewarding in regard to sexual behavior. I would take it that if you are attracted to someone of the same sex, feel love and joy for their presence and your own in union with one another, that your intent is to seek enlightenment in this joy, and agreement with the other, it would follow that to be sexual with someone of the opposite sex who do not feel these things for would be sexual misconduct. Thank you, I am humbled and grounded in light of reason and compassion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Koan: The Dead Man&#8217;s Answer by PATRICK</title>
		<link>http://www.dailybuddhism.com/archives/1365/comment-page-1#comment-3030</link>
		<dc:creator>PATRICK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 19:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailybuddhism.com/?p=1365#comment-3030</guid>
		<description>ONE HAND CAN MAKE ONE SOUND ALL BY ITSELF, AND ANY NUMBER OF SOUNDS WITH OTHER OBJECTS.

IF YOU HOLD ON TO ONE OF THOSE OBJECTS, ITS POSSIBLE TO MAKE OTHER SOUNDS.

HOLDING AN OBJECT, LIMITS YOUR HAND&#039;S ABILITY TO MAKE SOME SOUNDS, BUT ENABLES YOU TO MAKE OTHERS.

IF YOU WISH TO MAKE THE HIGHEST NUMBER OF SOUNDS, YOU MUST HOLD AN OBJECT, AND EVENTUALLY LET IT GO.  NOTHING WRONG WITH HOLDING IT AS LONG AS YOU REALIZE THAT YOU WILL EVENTUALLY LET IT GO.  TAKE THAT INTO ACCOUNT WHEN YOU MODULATE THE AMOUNT OF TIME YOU SPEND HOLDING IT.

PAIN IS ROOTED IN DESIRE, DESIRE TO HOLD IT, BUT USE YOUR KNOWLEDGE OF THIS DESIRE TO HOLD IT AND YOUR DISCOMFORT AND MODULATE IT AS NECESSARY FOR YOU.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ONE HAND CAN MAKE ONE SOUND ALL BY ITSELF, AND ANY NUMBER OF SOUNDS WITH OTHER OBJECTS.</p>
<p>IF YOU HOLD ON TO ONE OF THOSE OBJECTS, ITS POSSIBLE TO MAKE OTHER SOUNDS.</p>
<p>HOLDING AN OBJECT, LIMITS YOUR HAND&#8217;S ABILITY TO MAKE SOME SOUNDS, BUT ENABLES YOU TO MAKE OTHERS.</p>
<p>IF YOU WISH TO MAKE THE HIGHEST NUMBER OF SOUNDS, YOU MUST HOLD AN OBJECT, AND EVENTUALLY LET IT GO.  NOTHING WRONG WITH HOLDING IT AS LONG AS YOU REALIZE THAT YOU WILL EVENTUALLY LET IT GO.  TAKE THAT INTO ACCOUNT WHEN YOU MODULATE THE AMOUNT OF TIME YOU SPEND HOLDING IT.</p>
<p>PAIN IS ROOTED IN DESIRE, DESIRE TO HOLD IT, BUT USE YOUR KNOWLEDGE OF THIS DESIRE TO HOLD IT AND YOUR DISCOMFORT AND MODULATE IT AS NECESSARY FOR YOU.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Enlightenment: Are We There Yet? by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.dailybuddhism.com/archives/1201/comment-page-1#comment-3029</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 19:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailybuddhism.com/?p=1201#comment-3029</guid>
		<description>you will know because you will be in a constant state of meditation, your deepest most inner state will be your only state</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you will know because you will be in a constant state of meditation, your deepest most inner state will be your only state</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Koan: The Stingy Artist by spiralcosmosart</title>
		<link>http://www.dailybuddhism.com/archives/1406/comment-page-1#comment-3028</link>
		<dc:creator>spiralcosmosart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 18:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailybuddhism.com/?p=1406#comment-3028</guid>
		<description>I think the story Gessen is a lot like the enigma of modern multi-million dollar art pieces today.  Consider the works of Jackson Pollock, Damien Hirst, Cy Twombly, and Andy Warhol.  Some of these works are simple and not that complicated to produced but are associated with big time ultra wealthy art collector&#039;s investments.  It seems to me a lot of these artists have to hide their generosity to attract some of the most greedy and materialistic customers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the story Gessen is a lot like the enigma of modern multi-million dollar art pieces today.  Consider the works of Jackson Pollock, Damien Hirst, Cy Twombly, and Andy Warhol.  Some of these works are simple and not that complicated to produced but are associated with big time ultra wealthy art collector&#8217;s investments.  It seems to me a lot of these artists have to hide their generosity to attract some of the most greedy and materialistic customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

